|
Elizabeth Kate Switaj
|
|
Archive for ‘Internet’ Category
You probably know by now that GeoCities has officially disappeared from the web, and while this has led to a lot of well-deserved jokes about the death of blinking text, obnoxious graphics, and other aspects of awful webdesign, it’s worth remembering that GeoCities also represented an important stage in the development of the web and how we participate in it. I don’t think I’m the only person who built their first website (or, as we called it back in the mid-90s, homepage) there and eventually moved to their own domain. Now, I will admit to having used a few obnoxious bouncing graphics when I started out, but it was by playing with webdesign on GeoCities that I learned just how distracting those could be (as well as which colors of text and background don’t work so well together). It was also how I learned HTML. GeoCities also helped me learn about the importance of interactivity. (Remember guestbooks?) GeoCities also had, in nascent form, some of what we now consider aspects of Web 2.0. The homepages were organized into theme-based communities. (I was in SoHo with the other artists, SoHo/Cafe to be specific.) Through neighborhood-based directories and chats, you could connect with your “neighbors”. This never really developed into the sort of connectivity you can see in later community sites such as Livejournal, and in some ways GeoCities actually went backwards after Yahoo! bought it (at least, interest-based communities seemed to be de-emphasized).
Related articles by Zemanta
Sep
12
2009
The Panic on the Potomac and Media Rumors
We’ve all heard about the potential for rumors to spread rapidly through social media, especially Twitter, and you’ve probably seen a false report of a celebrity death or two if you’re at all active in the same. As yesterday’s panic on the Potomac shows us, however, it isn’t only online media that is vulnerable to mistaken reporting. When networks run with unsubstantiated reports, however, the effect is quite different from when such things are spread primarily by citizen reporters tweeting. Because supposedly reliable news agencies, starting with CNN, were reporting gunshots fired, the DC police department rushed to the scene, while flights at Reagan National Airport were grounded. I’m not sure that a trending topic on Twitter would have had such an impact, yet rumors instigated through Twitter tend to get fact-checked rather quickly through @ replies looking for verifiable sources. If someone saying “bang bang” over a loudspeaker had started off a rumor about gunfire that was confined to social media, we would all be having a good laugh right now about how silly people were to confuse the two and how gullible the people who passed the story on were. Instead we’re getting a lot of talking-head outrage about the Coast Guard training on 9/11 and letters from networks justifying their coverage decisions. The coast guard is reviewing their procedures. Now, maybe the Coast Guard should have been more sensitive to people’s fears. That said, the story shows the speciousness of arguing against social media as an information source because it is vulnerable to false information. It also calls into question how we decide which misinterpretations should be anticipated or, failing that, taken seriously. Related articles by Zemanta
One of Facebook’s more popular applications, Pick 5 by Living Social shares much of the appeal of writing poetry in reproducible forms (new or traditional). Pick 5 starts with a sometimes user-generated (and occasionally sponsored) category or question. To choose your five answers, you start typing in a text box to generate a list of words or phrases with images; if you can’t find what you’re looking for, you can upload your own picture. You can post your answers to your profile and compare your answers with your friends’. The pleasure of Pick 5, then, is in seeing what your friends have selected within this form—how the lists your friends and acquaintances create differ from or resemble your own. This isn’t all that different from a group of friends comparing their sestinas, abecedarians, or Spenserian sonnets. I do not mean to suggest that creating a sestina is as easing as filling in the blanks (though my most successful preteen poem, a line-by-line transformation of The Raven into The Swim Coach, certainly followed a similar procedure), only that at least some of the joys of writing formal verse are similar to the joys provided by applications such as Pick 5. Still, there is another level to this. Some of the best Pick 5s, like much of the best formal verse, stretch the form. A category may be taken in a snarkily literal way: according to the application, very few of my Facebook friends leave the house without their heads. Sarcastic answers to the favorite parts of the Fourth of July category included variations on things burning down. Imagined dinner party guests have been chosen on the basis of who would have the best arguments rather than who would be most interesting to meet. The rules of the form are broken when someone chooses the same item for all five slots. This latter case is most similar to Bernadette Mayer’s Sonnets, of which Juliana Spahr noted:
Mayer’s work, however, required much more background reading before it could be written and much more attention to craft to make it work. Related articles by Zemanta
Apr
26
2009
Five Overlooked Aspects of the Swine Flu StoryEven as CNN cuts every five minutes to show the latest maps of suspected and confirmed cases of swine flu in the US (with occasional mentions of the rest of the world) there’s a lot that that’s being left out of the story. Here are five things you probably haven’t heard much about in connection with the flu:
As many of you already know, I’m one of the founding editors of a group feminist blog that launched earlier this month, Gender Across Borders. Here’s a quick list of my posts over there: |